Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28399

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : OC23 - OC27 Full Version

Proportion of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis Presenting as Difficult-to-control Asthma in Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Centre using the Modified ISHAM Criteria: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63319.18421
Pillai Neetu Soman, Paulo Varghese Akkara, Sunny George, TP Rajagopal

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sunny George,
Associate Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Ernakulam, HMT Road, North Kalamassery, Kochi-683503, Kerala, India.
E-mail: sunsuna1@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Difficult-to-control asthmatics, as defined by the Global Initiative for Management of Asthma (GINA), belong to a subset of patients whose symptoms remain uncontrolled despite adhering to maximal optimised therapy. Complex hypersensitivity reactions in response to airway colonisation with Aspergillus fumigatus, which occurs in patients with asthma or cystic fibrosis, are established factors for a poor response to treatment and frequent exacerbations. Only limited data related to Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is available from India, particularly from Kerala.

Aim: To assess the occurrence of ABPA in patients with difficult-to-control asthma using the modified ISHAM criteria.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional analysis was conducted in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India from February 2019 to July 2020. The study population comprised asthmatics attending the Pulmonary Medicine Outpatient Services who were on regular medications, including optimal doses of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist combinations. Patients with two or more exacerbations per year requiring systemic steroids for symptom control and a positive skin test for Aspergillus fumigatus antigen were further analysed using the modified International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (IHAM) criteria to determine the proportion of difficult-to-control asthmatics with ABPA. A total of 185 subjects were enrolled. Twelve patients opted out of the study, and the remaining 173 patients were screened using the modified ISHAM criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using Stastistical Packages of Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Continuous parameters were expressed as mean and median, while categorical parameters were measured as frequency and percentages.

Results: It was observed that 104 (60.1%) patients belonged to the age group between 41-60 years, while approximately 60 patients (34.7%) were below 40 years of age. Among the 173 patients, 86 (49.7%) tested positive for Aspergillus fumigatus antigen. Applying the ISHAM criteria, it was found that only 17 (9.8%) of these patients satisfied the criteria for co-existent ABPA. A total of 101 patients (58.4%) required at least one hospital admission, while 4 (2.3%) patients required more than three hospital admissions per year. Total 21 (12.1%) patients had IgE specific to Aspergillus fumigatus, while total IgE levels were elevated in 46 (26.6%) cases. Thirty-six cases (20.8%) had a high peripheral eosinophil count

Conclusion: This study suggests the possibility of the treating physician overlooking 10% of asthmatics in this region who are being managed as difficult-to-control asthma, but who have co-existent ABPA. This subset should be identified early in the course and managed separately for better treatment response.

Keywords

Aspergillus fumigatus, Asthma, International society for human and animal mycology

Exacerbations of asthma are episodes characterised by a progressive decrease in lung function, warranting a change in treatment (1),(2). Aspergillus fumigatus is a ubiquitous saprophytic mould that thrives on decaying organic matter (3). It induces a cascade of hypersensitivity reactions, propagating inflammation and resulting in pneumonia, mucoid impactions, bronchial obstructions, and resultant bronchiectasis. It may mimic slowly resolving pneumonia, tuberculosis, pulmonary thromboembolism, bronchogenic carcinoma, or even pleural effusion (4),(5),(6),(7). Clinically, it presents as difficult-to-control asthma despite frequent use of steroids. It may also be associated with fever, malaise, blood in sputum, or may present predominantly as allergic rhinosinusitis (8),(9). The condition is being increasingly recognised, and recent publications have reported prevalence rates ranging from 5.9% to 20.5% for ABPA and 38-43% for Aspergillus Hypersensitivity (AH) (10),(11),(12),(13). After conducting an exhaustive search in PubMed and National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), two studies were found that evidently were prevalence studies done in North India. In one study done by Singla N et al., a high prevalence of 70% was found among a series of 50 patients (14). It was completely based on serology. In the second study done among severe asthmatics by Nath A et al., in a North Indian tertiary care center, it was observed that out of 350 patients, 21.7% were found to have ABPA (15). Prasad R et al., reported a prevalence of 30.3% for AH and 7.4% for ABPA (16). They performed screening through Aspergillus skin tests and serology. If clinical suspicion for ABPA exists, laboratory and imaging studies should be obtained to establish the diagnosis.

Accordingly, management strategies and screening algorithms could be incorporated, or modifications could be suggested to standard accepted management guidelines. The diagnostic criteria for ABPA have been a subject of debate, and the method of screening patients with asthma has also undergone considerable change with the proactive intention of identifying the various phenotypes. This is the reason for the variable prevalence rates of AH and ABPA reported in the literature. Aspergillus skin tests have been used for screening patients with bronchial asthma for AH and ABPA. If specific IgE is used, there is a possibility that patients colonised with other Aspergillus species might be overlooked, leading to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, it is important to note that 40% of patients with uncontrolled asthma can have AH without ABPA (17). Patients who do not meet the diagnostic criteria for ABPA are classified as having Severe Asthma with Fungal Sensitisation (SAFS) (18),(19). ISHAM criteria have been widely used to diagnose ABPA, and several modifications have been suggested to the original criteria (20).

However, prevalence data from southern India is sparse. In resource-limited settings, the search for easier ways to make a proper diagnosis of ABPA in patients labeled and referred to as refractory asthmatics from elsewhere has been the major intention behind the present study. Thus, the aim of the study was to assess the occurrence of ABPA in patients with difficult-to-control asthma using modified ISHAM criteria.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India among asthmatics attending the Outpatient Department at the Institute of Chest Diseases. The study included patients who were on regular medications and had experienced two or more exacerbations per year, requiring systemic steroids for symptom control, over a period of 18 months from February 2019 to July 2020. The study obtained approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC approval number: GMCKKD/RP 2019/IEC/73).

Sample size: The sampling method used was consecutive sampling, and the sample size was determined based on a prevalence of ABPA as 16% from a previous study (12). The minimum sample size calculated was 185.

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with asthma who were on optimal inhaled medications with or without oral corticosteroids, and had a history of at least one acute episode in a three-month period within the last year.

Exclusion criteria: Patients previously diagnosed with ABPA, patients on systemic glucocorticoids for more than one week or for more than three weeks within the last six months, patients with asthma-COPD overlap, diagnosed cases of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Cystic fibrosis, Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Post-Tuberculosis sequelae, People Living With HIV-AIDS (PLWHA) and patients on long-term immunomodulators, patients with bilateral bronchiectasis of established alternate aetiology, and pregnant patients.

Study Procedure

In this study, the authors utilised the modification proposed by the ISHAM working group in 2013 for making a diagnosis in target group (Table/Fig 1) (20). Chest X-ray (CXR) was the only imaging tool used in the present study. A total of 185 subjects were included in the study, and 12 patients who were not willing to participate were excluded. High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) was a component of the criteria, but due to ease and cost-effectiveness, CXR was considered an alternative in this study.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 21.0. Continuous parameters were expressed as mean and median, while categorical parameters were measured as frequency and percentages.

Results

A total of 173 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Among the 173 patients, 86 (49.7%) tested positive for Aspergillus fumigatus antigen. Out of this, 100 (57.8%) were males and 73 (42.2%) were females. It was observed that 104 (60.1%) patients belonged to the age group between 41-60 years, while approximately 60 patients (34.7%) were below 40 years of age (Table/Fig 2).

When the modified ISHAM criteria were applied to the study group, a total of 17 out of 173 patients met the criteria for ABPA, accounting for 9.83%, which is a significant proportion. The number of exacerbations in the previous year for these patients is as per the data shown in (Table/Fig 3). A large majority of these patients, 101 (58.4%), required at least one hospital admission per year (Table/Fig 3).

It was observed that 59 (34%) patients were smokers, and they tended to have more exacerbations compared to others. Most of them also reported a history of dust exposure as part of their occupation, which could be a reason for confounding bias. Among asthmatics who were smokers, 36 (59.3%) had 2 or 3 episodes of exacerbations (Table/Fig 4).

Most of the patients selected for the study had a duration of illness of more than three years, but a duration of illness as high as 15 years was also noticed (Table/Fig 5). Approximately 98 (56.6%) patients had a family history of asthma in either of their parents. Spirometry results showed that 107 (61.8%) patients had an obstructive pattern, while approximately 57 (32.9%) had a mixed pattern, and 9 (5.2%) had restrictive abnormalities.

When analysing the treatment history, it was observed that a large proportion, 160 (92.5%) of patients, were already on the appropriate inhaler comprising inhaled corticost frequency table. The cut-off value used eroids in the appropriate dosage with a long-acting beta agonist combination, as per GINA guidelines, and proper inhaler technique was monitored by the investigator during each visit (Table/Fig 6) (1),(21).

A total of 173 patients who satisfied the eligibility criteria were subjected to an intradermal aspergillus skin test, and 86 (49.7%) showed positivity. Serum total IgE levels above 1000 IU/mL were considered positive, and 46 (26.6%) patients tested positive. The cut-off value used for IgE specific to Aspergillus fumigatus, as per ISHAM group criteria, was >35 kuA, and the results were plotted in a frequency table. The cut-off value used for Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC) was >500 cells/UL, as per the ISHAM criteria, determined through peripheral blood investigation. Total 36 (20.8%) patients in the study group satisfied this criterion (Table/Fig 7).

Radiological evaluation for the 21 patients who satisfied the remaining three criteria in the ISHAM criteria revealed normal CXR in 12 patients (57.1%), while the rest presented with fleeting infiltrates, ring shadows, and pneumonic patch consolidation. Only 9 (42.9%) patients had chest radiographic abnormalities, and the rest had normal X-rays (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

Refractory asthma, also known as difficult-to-control asthma, is a global cause of morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that there are approximately five million cases of ABPA globally, with India alone accounting for about 1.4 million cases (10). The occurrence of ABPA among asthmatic patients in specialised clinics can be as high as 13% (11). Studies investigating the causes of exacerbations and recurrent flare-ups have been conducted in various parts of the world (22),(23),(24),(25). However, one of the commonly overlooked causes is ABPA, which remains underdiagnosed due to factors such as complexity in diagnostic criteria and the lack of a gold standard treatment (26),(27).

In a study involving 155 patients with ABPA complicating asthma, nearly 19% of the patients were classified as having well-controlled asthma with the use of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists (28). In the current study, approximately 93% of the patients were also using the appropriate inhaler with proper inhaler technique, which was confirmed as acceptable. Early detection and initiation of treatment can potentially prevent the progression of the disease to bronchiectasis and end-stage pleuro-parenchymal fibrosis, which are commonly associated with increased morbidity and mortality in ABPA. The use of systemic steroids, which is the current standard treatment strategy for ABPA, is not acceptable to a significant number of patients labeled as asthmatics. Convincing patients to accept this treatment is a major obstacle, and some may consider the exacerbation stage as an ineffective response to long-term steroid use. Unfortunately, there is insufficient scientific evidence to support firm conclusions for alternative treatment options, and randomised clinical trials are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of biologics for ABPA. Therefore, early identification of these cases can have a significant impact on their outcomes, rather than labeling them as refractory asthma.

Here the researchers utilised the modified ISHAM group criteria from 2013 to diagnose ABPA in refractory patients. This criterion was simple to apply, and since many of our patients lacked medical insurance, couldn’t perform the ideal radiological investigation, HRCT. Although consistent radiological opacities are mentioned as an optional criterion, the investigators chose chest x ray as the sole radiological investigation to avoid bias. This decision was made even though newer modifications of the criteria have emerged over time. CXR is the most commonly used imaging technique for diagnosing ABPA, but it is often unreliable, as nearly 50% of individuals may have normal CXRs. This limitation means that subtle lesions, which can only be detected by HRCT, may be missed. However, CXR is still useful as a screening tool. The expert consensus in 2019, on the modified ISHAM criteria, also included post-tuberculous cavitatory disease and COPD as vulnerable groups due to their deranged T-cell mediated immunity. Fleeting shadows, a classic description of ABPA, result from mucus plugs within dilated bronchi and bronchioles. These shadows appear to move to various places as the mucus plugs are expelled through coughing and re-enter different bronchi or bronchioles. Hilar shadows (40%), air-fluid levels (10-20%), diffuse nodular shadows (10-20%), signs of hyperinflation (10-30%), avascular areas (10%), and pleural effusion (though rare, found in about 5% of patients) are other radiological findings. HRCT is considered the best imaging diagnostic modality, and High Attenuation Mucus (HAM) is the hallmark of ABPA on HRCT (29),(30),(31),(32),(33),(34),(35),(36).

Elevated levels of Aspergillus-specific IgE are considered the hallmark of ABPA. However, there has been a lot of controversy regarding its normal level or, more specifically, its cut-off level. The current cut-off level, as determined by the ISHAM group, is >0.35 kUA/L, measured using fluorescent enzyme immunoassay. This test has a sensitivity of almost 100% and can be used as a good screening tool but is less reliable for follow-up purposes. Among the patients, 12.1% had IgE specific to Aspergillus fumigatus, while total IgE was elevated in 26.6% of cases. In our setting, an alternate criterion of a skin prick test to assess immediate cutaneous hypersensitivity to Aspergillus antigen was found to be much easier. Although A. fumigatus-specific IgG antibodies in serum are thought to have better sensitivity than serum precipitins, they were not considered in this study group due to cost constraints and the availability of two other applicable criteria (37). Absolute eosinophil counts, although easily available, can be elevated in various conditions, making it a nonspecific finding in ABPA. The ISHAM group has determined a cut-off value of AEC >500 cells/microliter for the diagnosis of ABPA. Among the cases, 20.8% had a high absolute eosinophil count. Applying the modified ISHAM criteria, it was found that 9.8% of these patients met the criteria for co-existent ABPA.

The presence of nearly 10% undiagnosed ABPA among difficult-to-control asthmatics highlights the importance of proper identification. Newer treatment strategies that address the pathophysiology of both diseases in this subset require closer observation and randomised trials to assess their efficacy in reducing exacerbation rates, preserving lung function, and halting progression to end-stage fibrotic disease. Currently, corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment as they control the profound inflammatory process involved in ABPA and asthma, preventing disease progression to end-stage fibrosis (38). Antifungals are also utilised in ABPA as steroid-sparing agents and to reduce fungal colonisation of the airways. Azoles such as itraconazole,voriconazole, posaconazole, and aerosolised Amphotericin-B agents are used with caution (39),(40). Omalizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody that targets IgE, as well as newer targeted agents like mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab, have shown remarkable reduction in the number of exacerbations. Randomised double blind trials are needed to determine whether there are any additional benefits for this subset of patients if monoclonal antibodies could be started, when ABPA is detected earlier in the course of refractory asthmatics (41),(42),(43),(44),(45).

Limitation(s)

Asthmatics with frequent exacerbations and difficult-to-control symptoms, attending a tertiary care center, were enrolled in the study. However, it is important to note that this could lead to selection bias due to convenient sampling. Additionally, the lack of HRCT screening for these patients is a major limitation for the study in terms of diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

This study suggests the possibility that treating physicians may overlook a significant number (10%) of asthmatics who are being managed for difficult-to-control asthma but actually have co-existent ABPA. These patients may require more aggressive management, including the use of systemic steroids, for proper control of their condition. Identifying and diagnosing these individuals early in the course of the disease would open up research opportunities to explore the role of newer biological treatments in this subset of patients.

References

1.
Ginasthma.org. (cited 2021 Jan 22). Available from: https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GINA-2020-report_20_06_04-1-wms.pdf.
2.
Pandit S, Choudhury S, Das A, Datta S, Das SK. Atypical presentation of allergic Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: An unusual cause of difficult-to-treat asthma. J Family Med Prim Care. 2013;2(1):98-100. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Greenberger PA. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110(5):685-92. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Azad C, Jat KR, Aggarwal P. Bronchial asthma with ABPA presenting as PTE. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013;17(3):188-89. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Joshi J, Chaudhary A, Utpat K, Desai U. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis masquerading as malignancy in a non asthmatic: A rare case report. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;30(1):35. [crossref]
6.
Madan K, Guleria R. Vanishing lung mass in a patient with asthma. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5(2):E45-49.
7.
Madan K, Bal A, Agarwal R. Pleural effusion in a patient with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Respir Care. 2012;57(9):1509-13. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Patel G, Greenberger PA. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019;40(6):421-24. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Manning SC, Merkel M, Kriesel K, Vuitch F, Marple B. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(6):170-76. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Denning DW, Pleuvry A, Cole DC. Global burden of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with asthma and its complication chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in adults. Med Mycol. 2013;51(4):361-70. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. Aspergillus hypersensitivity and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with bronchial asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13:936-44.
12.
Kumar R, Gaur SN. Prevalence of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with bronchial asthma. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2000;18(4):181-85.
13.
Agarwal R, Denning DW, Chakrabarti A. Estimation of the burden of chronic and allergic pulmonary aspergillosis in India. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114745. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Singla N, Bhankhur D, Aggarwal D, Chander J. Prevalence of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis among patients with severe bronchial asthma in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;62(1):111. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Nath A, Khan A, Hashim Z, Patra JK. Prevalence of Aspergillus hypersensitivity and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with bronchial asthma at a tertiary care center in North India. Lung India. 2017;34(2):150-54. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Prasad R, Garg R, Sanjay, Shukla AD. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A review of 42 patients from a tertiary care center in India. Lung India. 2009;26(2):38-40. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ramachandran P, Savio J, Jairaj V, Devaraj U, D’Souza G. A cross-sectional study of skin prick test to Aspergillus fumigatus antigen in asthmatic patients seen at a tertiary health care center. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;33(1):19-24. [crossref]
18.
Rathore Y, Jindal A, Jain S, Jain VK, Joshi V. Clinical, radiological, and immunological assessment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;34(1):34. [crossref]
19.
Denning DW, O’Driscoll BR, Powell G, Chew F, Atherton GT, Vyas A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of oral antifungal treatment for severe asthma with fungal sensitization: The Fungal Asthma Sensitization Trial (FAST) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(1):11-18. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Agarwal R, Chakrabarti A, Shah A, Gupta D, Meis JF, Guleria R, et al. ABPA complicating asthma ISHAM working group. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: Review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(8):850-73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Roy A, Battle K, Lurslurchachi L, Halm EA, Wisnivesky JP. Inhaler device, administration technique, and adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma. Prim Care Respir J. 2011;20:148-54. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Al-Saleh AA, Farid E, Makhlooq M, Mahdi M, Reda M, Zaid T, et al. Allergic aspergillosis in asthmatic patients in a tertiary hospital in the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Lab Physicians. 2019;11(4):373-81. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Ma YL, Zhang WB, Yu B, Chen YW, Mu S, Cui YL. Prevalence of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in Chinese patients with bronchial asthma. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2011;34(12):909-13.
24.
Agarwal R, Nath A, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Chakrabarti A. Aspergillus hypersensitivity and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with acute severe asthma in a respiratory intensive care unit in North India. Mycoses. 2010;53(2):138-43. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Agarwal R, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Muthu V, Prasad KT, Bal A, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(6):529-49. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Saxena P, Choudhary H, Muthu V, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Prasad KT, et al. Which are the optimal criteria for the diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis? A latent class analysis. J. Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(1):328-35. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Agarwal R, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN. Developments in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(12):1317-34. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Agarwal R, Gupta D, Aggarwal AN, Saxena AK, Chakrabarti A, Jindal SK. Clinical significance of hyperattenuating mucoid impaction in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: An analysis of 155 patients. Chest. 2007;132(4):1183-90. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Shah A, Panchal N, Agarwal AK. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: The spectrum of roentgenologic appearances. Indian J Radiol Imag. 1999;9:107-12. [Google Scholar].
30.
Kumar R, Goel N. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A clinico-serological correlation with radiologic profile. J Asthma. 2013;50(7):759-63. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Panchal N, Pant C, Bhagat R, Shah A. Central bronchiectasis in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: Comparative evaluation of computed tomography of the thorax with bronchography. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(7):1290-93. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Patil S, Patil R. Fleeting pulmonary infiltrates in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, Misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2018;7(2):186-90. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Kiely JL, Spense L, Henry M, Hurley MF, Kelleher N, Bredin CP. Chest radiographic staging in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: Relationship with immunological findings. Eur Respir J. 1998;12(2):453-56. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Sunzini F, Barbato C, Canofari C, Lugari L, Perricone R, Bergamini A. Clinical and radiological signs of ABPA associated with airways infection with Aspergillus in the absence of specific IgE. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;48(5):202-04.
35.
Kang M, Deoghuria D, Varma S, Gupta D, Bhatia A, Khandelwal N. Role of HRCT in detection and characterization of pulmonary abnormalities in patients with febrile neutropenia. Lung India. 2013;30(2):124-30. Doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.110420. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Morozov A, Applegate KE, Brown S, Howenstine M. High-attenuation mucus plugs on MDCT in a child with cystic fibrosis: Potential cause and differential diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:592-95. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Agarwal R, Dua D, Choudhary H, Aggarwal AN, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, et al. Role of Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG in diagnosis and monitoring treatment response in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2017;60(1):33-39. Doi: 10.1111/myc.12541. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Dhooria S, Singh Sehgal I, Garg M, Saikia B, et al. A randomised trial of glucocorticoids in acute-stage allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis complicating asthma. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):490-98. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Konstantinou AE, Christaki E, Pitsios C. Daily dose of itraconazole 100 mg to treat allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) related eosinophilia: A case report. Hippokratia. 2017;21(3):144-46.
40.
Wark PAB, Gibson PG, Wilson AJ. Azoles for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis associated with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001108. [crossref]
41.
Collins J, Devos G, Hudes G, Rosenstreich D. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis treated successfully for one year with omalizumab. J Asthma Allergy. 2012;5:65-70. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Homma T, Kurokawa M, Matsukura S, Yamaguchi M, Adachi M. Anti-IgE therapy for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016;49(3):459-63. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Mümmler C, Kemmerich B, Behr J, Kneidinger N, Milger K. Differential response to biologics in a patient with severe asthma and ABPA: A role for dupilumab? Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020;16:55. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Boyle M, Mulrennan S, Morey S, Vekaria S, Popowicz N, Tai A. Mepolizumab use in cystic fibrosis-associated allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Respirol Case Rep. 2021;9(1):e00696. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Manti S, Giallongo A, Parisi GF, Papale M, Mulè E, Aloisio D, et al. Biologic drugs in treating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review. Eur Respir Rev. 2022;31:220011.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63319.18421

Date of Submission: Feb 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 11, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com